4.7 Article

Seasonality of isoprenoid emissions from a primary rainforest in central Amazonia

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 3903-3925

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-3903-2016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq (Brazilian government)
  2. Philecology Foundation of Fort Worth, Texas
  3. National Science Foundation [0730305, CHE 0216226]
  4. Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Large Biosphere-Atmosphere (LBA) as a part of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon) project in Manaus, Brazil [2014/5]
  6. European Space Agency [4000104001/11/I-NB]
  7. Office Of The Director
  8. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0730305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tropical rainforests are an important source of isoprenoid and other volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions to the atmosphere. The seasonal variation of these compounds is however still poorly understood. In this study, vertical profiles of mixing ratios of isoprene, total monoterpenes and total sesquiterpenes, were measured within and above the canopy, in a primary rainforest in central Amazonia, using a proton transfer reaction - mass spectrometer (PTR-MS). Fluxes of these compounds from the canopy into the atmosphere were estimated from PTR-MS measurements by using an inverse Lagrangian transport model. Measurements were carried out continuously from September 2010 to January 2011, encompassing the dry and wet seasons. Mixing ratios were higher during the dry (isoprene - 2.68 +/- 0.9 ppbv, total monoterpenes - 0.67 +/- 0.3 ppbv; total sesquiterpenes - 0.09 +/- 0.07 ppbv) than the wet season (isoprene - 1.66 +/- 0.9 ppbv, total monoterpenes - 0.47 +/- 0.2 ppbv; total sesquiterpenes - 0.03 +/- 0.02 ppbv) for all compounds. Ambient air temperature and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) behaved similarly. Daytime isoprene and total monoterpene mixing ratios were highest within the canopy, rather than near the ground or above the canopy. By comparison, daytime total sesquiterpene mixing ratios were highest near the ground. Daytime fluxes varied significantly between seasons for all compounds. The maximums for isoprene (2.53 +/- 0.5 A mu mol m(-2) h(-1)) and total monoterpenes (1.77 A +/- 0.05aEuro-A mu mol m(-2) h(-1)) were observed in the late dry season, whereas the maximum for total sesquiterpenes was found during the dry-to-wet transition season (0.77 A +/- 0.1aEuro-A mu mol m(-2) h(-1)). These flux estimates suggest that the canopy is the main source of isoprenoids emitted into the atmosphere for all seasons. However, uncertainties in turbulence parameterization near the ground could affect estimates of fluxes that come from the ground. Leaf phenology seemed to be an important driver of seasonal variation of isoprenoid emissions. Although remote sensing observations of changes in leaf area index were used to estimate leaf phenology, MEGAN 2.1 did not fully capture the behavior of seasonal emissions observed in this study. This could be a result of very local effects on the observed emissions, but also suggest that other parameters need to be better determined in biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) models. Our results support established findings that seasonality of isoprenoids are driven by seasonal changes in light, temperature and leaf phenology. However, they suggest that leaf phenology and its role on isoprenoid production and emission from tropical plant species needs to be better understood in order to develop mechanistic explanations for seasonal variation in emissions. This also may reduce the uncertainties of model estimates associated with the responses to environmental factors. Therefore, this study strongly encourages long-term measurements of isoprenoid emissions, environmental factors and leaf phenology from leaf to ecosystem scale, with the purpose of improving BVOC model approaches that can characterize seasonality of isoprenoid emissions from tropical rainforests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available