4.3 Review

Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 727-735

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1086264

Keywords

haptic-guided; MAKO; outcomes; robot-assisted surgery; total knee arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Funding

  1. TissueGene, Inc
  2. Stryker
  3. DJ Orthopaedics
  4. Sage Products
  5. TissueGene
  6. Microport
  7. Ongoing Care Solutions
  8. Orthosensor
  9. National Institutes of Health (NIAMSNICHD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robotics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has undergone vast improvements. Although some of the systems have fallen out of favor due to safety concerns, there has been recent increased interest for semi-active haptic robotic systems that provide intraoperative tactile feedback to the surgeon. The potential advantages include improvements in radiographic outcomes, reducing the incidence of mechanical axis malalignment of the lower extremity and better tissue balance. Proponents of robotic technology believe that these improvements may lead to superior functional outcomes and implant survivorship. We aim to discuss robotic technology development, outcomes of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty and the future outlook. Short-term follow-up studies on robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty suggest that, although some alignment objectives may have been achieved, more studies regarding functional outcomes are needed. Furthermore, studies evaluating the projected cost-benefit analyses of this new technology are needed before widespread adoption. Nevertheless, the short-term results warrant further evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available