4.0 Article

Malignant Otitis Externa Outcomes: A Study of the University HealthSystem Consortium Database

Journal

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 8, Pages 514-520

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0003489418778056

Keywords

osteomyelitis; malignant otitis externa; miscellaneous; necrotizing otitis externa; cranial nerve paralysis; morbidity

Funding

  1. South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research (SCTR) Institute
  2. NIH/NCATS [UL1TR001450]
  3. Doris Duke Foundation
  4. Medical University of South Carolina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To characterize factors that affect outcomes for patients with malignant otitis externa (MOE). Methods: Retrospective review of inpatients with MOE was performed. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, complications, procedures, and mortalities were analyzed. Results: A total of 786 patients with MOE were identified. The mean hospitalization length of stay (LOS) was 18.6 days (SD = 19.7). The overall mortality rate was 2.5% (n = 20), and complication rate was 4.3% (n = 34). Increasing age significantly and positively correlated with the incidence of MOE (r = 0.979, P < .0001). Factors that were associated with an increased rate of mortality were sepsis (odds ratio [OR] = 18.5; ES = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.47-1.42), congestive heart failure (OR = 3.1; ES = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.02-0.82), weight loss (OR = 10.2; ES = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-1.85), and coagulopathy (OR = 8.8; ES = 1.84; 95% CI, 0.91-2.77). Surgical intervention was performed in 19.2% (n = 151) of patients. Facial nerve involvement was present in 15.5% (n = 122) of patients and was associated with a significantly longer LOS of 12.9 days (SD = 19.6; ES = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.03-0.41). Conclusions: This large multi-institutional database study of MOE demonstrates that several patient factors impact the LOS and mortality. Patients at risk for unfavorable outcomes include the elderly, male gender, comorbidities, or cranial nerve involvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available