4.7 Article

Final results of a randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with stage IVA and IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma-Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) 1303 Study

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 1972-1979

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy249

Keywords

nasopharyngeal carcinoma; locoregionally advanced; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy; phase III study

Categories

Funding

  1. Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG), National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to radiotherapy alone for treating locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Whether adding induction chemotherapy (IC) further improves the outcome warrants investigation. Patients and methods: This open-label multicenter phase III trial was conducted at 11 institutions in Taiwan. Patients with stage IVA or IVB NPC were randomized to receive IC followed by CCRT (I-CCRT) or CCRT alone. Patients in the I-CCRT arm received three cycles of mitomycin C, epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (MEPFL). All patients received 30 mg/m(2) cisplatin weekly during radiotherapy, which was delivered as 1.8-2.2 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week, to a total dose of 70 Gy or greater to the primary tumor and 66-70 Gy to the involved neck. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: In this study, 240 and 239 patients were randomized to CCRT and I-CCRT arm, respectively. The most prominent toxicities of induction were leukopenia (grade 3 and 4:47% and 12%) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 and 4: 24% and 3%). During radiotherapy, severe mucositis was the major side-effect in both arms; an increased number of patients in the. I-CCR I arm had myelosuppression; hence, discontinuation of weekly cisplatin was more common. After a median follow-up of 72.0 months, the I-CCRT arm had significantly higher DFS than that of the CCRT arm [5-year rate 61% versus 50%; hazard ratio=0.739, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.565 -0.965; P= 0.0264], after stratified for N3b and LDH, and adjusted for T stage. Conclusion: Induction with MEPFL before CCRT was tolerable and significantly improved the DES of patients with stage IVA NPC though overall survival not improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available