4.5 Article

Numerical investigation of the separation performance of full-scale AP1000 steam-water separator

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 204-223

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.08.048

Keywords

AP1000; Steam-water separator; Euler-Lagrange approach; Separation efficiency; Numerical simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406096]
  2. Tsinghua University
  3. Tsinghua Fudaoyuan Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The steam-water separator is a crucial equipment supplying high-quality steam for the turbines in the AP1000 nuclear power station. It is comprised of the gravity separation space, primary separator (swirl-vane separator), secondary separator (wave-type vanes separator) and auxiliary equipment. In the present study, full-scale three-dimension modeling and simulation are conducted using the Euler-Lagrange approach based on the AP1000 steam generator design drawing to investigate the steam water separating mechanism and the separation performance of the AP1000 separator. The details of steam-water separation efficiency and pressure drop are obtained in the gravity separation space, primary separator and secondary separator under various operating conditions. The numerical results indicate that the separation efficiency increases rapidly as the steam velocity increases and the relative humidity at the outlet of the AP1000 steam-water separator is less than 0.1% which satisfies the design standard of the AP1000 power station. In addition, the head cover and diffuser assembly structure into the upper of the primary separator greatly increases the steam-water separation efficiency though the pressure drop increases somehow as well, compared to the geometric model without head cover and diffuser assembly. Finally, the inlet velocity distribution of the secondary separator, resulting from the arrangement of the orifice plate in front of the secondary separator, affects the separation efficiency with +/- 9% discrepancy compared to the uniform inlet distribution. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available