4.3 Article

Individual and Partner-Level Factors Associated with Condom Non-Use Among African American STI Clinic Attendees in the Deep South: An Event-Level Analysis

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1334-1342

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-015-1266-9

Keywords

HIV; Concurrency; Substance use; Contraceptive use; African Americans

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DP2 DA040236]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [T32 HD049339]
  3. National Institutes of Mental Health [R25 MH083620]
  4. National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases [T32 DA13911, P30 AI042853]
  5. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [K01 AA020228]
  6. MAC AIDS Fund
  7. Brown/Lifespan/Tufts Center for AIDS Research and the Brown University Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The US HIV/AIDS epidemic is concentrated in the Deep South, yet factors contributing to HIV transmission are not fully understood. We examined relationships between substance use, sexual partnership characteristics, and condom non-use in an African American sample of STI clinic attendees in Jackson, Mississippi. We assessed condom non-use at last intercourse with up to three recent sexual partners reported by participants between January and June 2011. Participant- and partner-level correlates of condom non-use were examined using generalized estimating equations. The 1295 participants reported 2880 intercourse events, of which 1490 (51.7 %) involved condom non-use. Older age, lower educational attainment, reporting financial or material dependence on a sex partner, sex with a primary partner, and higher frequency of sex were associated with increased odds of condomless sex. HIV prevention efforts in the South should address underlying socioeconomic disparities and structural determinants that result in partner dependency and sexual risk behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available