4.5 Review

Azole antifungals: 35 years of invasive fungal infection management

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 787-798

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1032939

Keywords

albaconazole; antifungals; azole; isavuconazole; ravuconazole

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. Merck
  3. Astellas
  4. Viamet
  5. F2G
  6. Tokoyama
  7. Scynexis
  8. Amplyx

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prior to 1981, treatment options for invasive fungal infections were limited and associated with significant toxicities. The introduction of ketoconazole marked the beginning of an era of dramatic improvements over previous therapies for non-life-threatening mycosis. After nearly a decade of use, ketoconazole was quickly replaced by the triazoles fluconazole and itraconazole due to significant improvements in pharmacokinetic profile, spectrum of activity and safety. The triazoles posaconazole and voriconazole followed, and were better known for their further extended spectrum, specifically against emerging mold infections. With the exception of fluconazole, the triazoles have been plagued with significant inter-and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability and all possess significant drug interactions. Azoles currently in development appear to combine an in vitro spectrum of activity comparable to voriconazole and posaconazole with more predictable pharmacokinetics and fewer adverse effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available