4.5 Review

Prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1499-1516

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1100533

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm infections; persistence; antibiotic tolerance; anti-infective strategies; device related infections; prosthetic implants

Funding

  1. Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, College of Medicine
  2. Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine
  3. Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University
  4. Public Health Service [AI097511, NR013898]
  5. Public Health Preparedness for Infectious Diseases (PHPID) program
  6. MedImmune
  7. Biocomposites Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

S. aureus colonizes both artificial and tissue surfaces in humans causing chronic persistent infections that are difficult to cure. It is a notorious pathogen due to its antibiotic recalcitrance and phenotypic adaptability, both of which are facilitated by its ability to develop biofilms. S. aureus biofilms challenge conventional anti-infective approaches, most notably antibiotic therapy. Therefore there is an unmet need to develop and include parallel approaches that target S. aureus biofilm infections. This review discusses two broad anti-infective strategies: (1) preventative approaches (anti-biofilm surface coatings, the inclusion of biofilm-specific vaccine antigens); and (2) approaches aimed at eradicating established S. aureus biofilms, particularly those associated with implant infections. Advances in understanding the distinct nature of S. aureus biofilm development and pathogenesis have led to growing optimism in S. aureus biofilm targeted anti-infective strategies. Further research is needed however, to see the successful administration and validation of these approaches to the diverse types of infections caused by S. aureus biofilms from multiple clinical strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available