4.5 Article

BCL2-modifying factor promotes germ cell loss during murine oogenesis

Journal

REPRODUCTION
Volume 151, Issue 5, Pages 553-562

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/REP-15-0561

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Australia) [1007027, 1062702, 494802, 257502, 441101, 1050130, 406675, 1042629, 461299]
  2. Cancer Council Victoria (Sir Edward Dunlop Fellowship in Cancer Research)
  3. Victorian Cancer Agency (clinical fellowship)
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1062702] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apoptosis plays a prominent role during ovarian development by eliminating large numbers of germ cells from the female germ line. However, the precise mechanisms and regulatory proteins involved in germ cell death are yet to be determined. In this study, we characterised the role of the pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein, BCL2-modifying factor (BMF), in germ cell apoptosis in embryonic and neonatal mouse ovaries. BMF protein was immunohistochemically localised to germ cells at embryonic days 15.5 (E15.5) and E17.5 and postnatal day 1 (PN1), coincident with entry into the meiotic prophase, but was undetectable at E13.5, and only present at low levels at PN3 and PN5. Consistent with this expression pattern, loss of BMF in female mice was associated with a decrease in apoptosis at E15.5 and E17.5. Furthermore, increased numbers of germ cells were found in ovaries from Bmf(-/-) mice compared with WT animals at E15.5 and PN1. However, germ cell numbers were comparable between Bmf(-/-) and WT ovaries at PN3, PN5 and PN10. Collectively, these data indicate that BMF mediates foetal oocyte loss and its action limits the maximal number of germ cells attained in the developing ovary, but does not influence the number of primordial follicles initially established in ovarian reserve.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available