4.5 Article

Coupled Morphological-Hemodynamic Computational Analysis of Type B Aortic Dissection: A Longitudinal Study

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 927-939

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-2012-z

Keywords

Aortic dissection; Point set registration; Computational fluid dynamics; Large eddy simulation

Funding

  1. US-NSF Project [DMS 162040]
  2. NSF-XSEDE [TG-ASC160069]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1620406] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Progressive false lumen aneurysmal degeneration in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a complex process with a multi-factorial etiology. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations provide spatial and temporal hemodynamic quantities that facilitate understanding this disease progression. A longitudinal study was performed for a TBAD patient, who was diagnosed with the uncomplicated TBAD in 2006 and treated with optimal medical therapy but received surgery in 2010 due to late complication. Geometries of the aorta in 2006 and 2010 were reconstructed. With registration algorithms, we accurately quantified the evolution of the false lumen, while with CFD simulations we computed several hemodynamic indexes, including the wall shear stress (WSS), and the relative residence time (RRT). The numerical fluid model included large eddy simulation (LES) modeling for efficiently capturing the flow disturbances induced by the entry tears. In the absence of complete patient-specific data, the boundary conditions were based on a specific calibration method. Correlations between hemodynamics and the evolution field in time obtained by registration of the false lumen are discussed. Further testing of this methodology on a large cohort of patients may enable the use of CFD to predict whether patients, with originally uncomplicated TBAD, develop late complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available