4.7 Article

ASYMMETRY BETWEEN GALAXIES WITH CLOCKWISE HANDEDNESS AND COUNTERCLOCKWISE HANDEDNESS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 823, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/32

Keywords

galaxies: photometry; galaxies: spiral; Galaxy: general

Funding

  1. NSF [IIS-1546079]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1546079] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While it is clear that spiral galaxies can have different handedness, galaxies with clockwise patterns are assumed to be symmetric to galaxies with counterclockwise patterns in all of their other characteristics. Here, we use data from SDSS DR7 to show that photometric data can distinguish between clockwise and counterclockwise galaxies. Pattern recognition algorithms trained and tested using the photometric data of a clean, manually crafted data set of 13,440 spiral galaxies with z < 0.25 can predict the handedness of a spiral galaxy in similar to 64% of the cases, which is significantly higher than the mere chance accuracy of 50% (P < 10(-5)). Experiments with a different data set of 10,281 automatically classified galaxies showed similar results of similar to 65% classification accuracy, suggesting that the observed asymmetry is also consistent in data sets annotated in a fully automatic process, without human intervention. That shows that the photometric data collected by SDSS is sensitive to the handedness of the galaxy. Analysis of the number of galaxies classified as clockwise and counterclockwise by crowdsourcing shows that manual classification between spiral and elliptical galaxies can be affected by the handedness of the galaxy, and therefore the galaxy morphology analyzed by citizen science campaigns might be biased by the galaxy handedness. The code and data used in the experiment are publicly available, and the experiment can be easily replicated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available