4.3 Review

Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treating type 2 diabetes

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 505-524

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1006625

Keywords

cardiovascular outcome; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; heart failure; pancreas; safety; special population; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca/BMS
  2. Boehringer
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Janssen
  6. Merck Sharp Dohme
  7. Novartis
  8. NovoNordisk
  9. Sanofi
  10. Takeda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (gliptins) occupy a growing place in the armamentarium of drugs used for the management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, although some safety concerns have been raised in recent years. Areas covered: An updated review providing an analysis of available safety data (meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational cohort and case-control studies and pharmacovigilance reports) with five commercialized DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, linagliptin). A special focus is given to overall safety profile; pancreatic adverse events (AEs) (acute pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer); overall cardiovascular safety (myocardial infarction and stroke); congestive heart failure concern and finally, safety in special populations (elderly, renal impairment). Expert opinion: The good tolerance/safety profile of DPP-4 inhibitors has been largely confirmed, including in more fragile populations (elderly, renal impairment) with almost no increased risk of infection or gastrointestinal AEs, no weight gain and a minimal risk of hypoglycemia. Although an increased risk of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer was suspected, the complete set of available data appears reassuring so far. Cardiovascular safety of DPP-4 inhibitors has been proven but an unexpected increased risk of heart failure has been reported which should be confirmed in ongoing trials and better understood. Further postmarketing surveillance is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available