4.7 Article

Controlling excited-state contamination in nucleon matrix elements

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 93, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.114506

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-KA-1401020]
  3. LANL LDRD program
  4. PRISMA Cluster of Excellence at the University of Mainz
  5. M. Hildred Blewett Fellowship of the American Physical Society
  6. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-96ER40965]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC05-06OR23177, DE-SC0011090]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-96ER40965] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a detailed analysis of methods to reduce statistical errors and excited-state contamination in the calculation of matrix elements of quark bilinear operators in nucleon states. All the calculations were done on a 2 + 1-flavor ensemble with lattices of size 32(3) x 64 generated using the rational hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm at a = 0.081 fm and with M-pi = 312 MeV. The statistical precision of the data is improved using the all-mode-averaging method. We compare two methods for reducing excited-state contamination: a variational analysis and a 2-state fit to data at multiple values of the source-sink separation t(sep). We show that both methods can be tuned to significantly reduce excited-state contamination and discuss their relative advantages and cost effectiveness. A detailed analysis of the size of source smearing used in the calculation of quark propagators and the range of values of t(sep) needed to demonstrate convergence of the isovector charges of the nucleon to the t(sep) -> infinity estimates is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available