4.8 Article

In Situ Quantification of Surface Intermediates and Correlation to Discharge Products on Hematite Photoanodes Using a Combined Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Approach

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 3050-3057

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04896

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Illinois
  2. SACP Starter Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hematite is a promising photoanode for solar driven water splitting. Elucidating its surface chemical pathways is key to improving its performance. Here, we use redox titrations in the Surface Interrogation mode of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (SI-SECM) to quantitatively probe in situ the reactivity and time evolution of surface species formed on hematite during photo assisted water oxidation. Using SI-SECM, two distinct populations of oxidizing surface species were resolved with measured k(si) of 316 m(3)/(mol.s) and 2 m(3)/(mol.s) for the more and less reactive species, respectively. While the surface coverage of both species was found to increase as a function of applied bias, the rate constants did not change appreciably, suggesting that the mechanism of water oxidation is independent of bias potential. In the absence of applied potential, both populations exhibit decay that is well described by second order kinetics, with k(d) values of 1.2 X 10(5) +/- 0.2 x 10(5) and 6.3 X 10(3) +/- 0.9 X 10(3) m(2)/(mol.s) for the fast and slow reacting adsorbates, respectively. Using transient substrate generation/tip collection mode, we detected the evolution of as much as 1.0 mu mol/m(2) of H2O2 during this decay process, which correlates with the coverage observed by one of the titrated species. By deconvoluting the reactivity of multiple adsorbed reactants, these experiments demonstrate how SI-SECM enables direct observation of multiple adsorbates and reaction pathways on operating photoelectrodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available