4.7 Article

Energy-related performance measures employed in sustainable supply chains: A bibliometric analysis

Journal

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 1-15

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2016.02.001

Keywords

Energy; Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM); Green supply chain management (GSCM); Metrics; Indicators; Performance measures

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the metrics that have been used to address energy-related issues in green supply chain management (GSCM) and sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). The metrics were identified based on a structured content analysis of 115 peer-reviewed articles published in the Scopus database. A total of 113 unique energy-related metrics were identified. Only three metrics were used more than 10 times: energy use (24 times), energy consumption (21), and energy efficiency (11). The majority of the metrics were used only once (73 metrics) or twice (29). The results highlight a lack of agreement on how energy-related issues should be measured in GSCM and SSCM. To better understand the use of energy-related metrics in GSCM and SSCM highlighted in the literature, the metrics were analyzed using 13 key characteristics of SSCM. Approximately, two-thirds (65%) of the metrics focused exclusively on the environmental focus of SSCM. Thirty-nine (35%) metrics simultaneously addressed two or more key characteristics of SSCM. This paper presents an original contribution through one of the first in-depth analyses of metrics used to measure energy-related issues in the GSCM and SSCM areas. The analysis provides the basis for several recommendations on measuring energy-related issues, including sets of original standardized metrics, in supply chains going forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available