4.5 Article

Reactive oxygen species dynamics in roots of salt sensitive and salt tolerant cultivars of rice

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 550, Issue -, Pages 99-108

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.04.019

Keywords

Rice; Root; Salinity; Reactive oxygen species; NADPH oxidase; Proline

Funding

  1. Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (INSPIRE) Programme, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2010 [23]]
  2. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India [BT/PR13965/BRB/10/883/2010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salinity stress is one of the major constraints for growth and survival of plants that affects rice productivity worldwide. Hence, in the present study, roots of two contrasting salinity sensitive cultivars, IR64 (IR64, salt sensitive) and Luna Suvarna (LS, salt tolerant) were compared with regard to the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to derive clues for their differential salt stress adaptation mechanisms. In our investigation, the tolerant cultivar exhibited longer primary roots, more lateral roots, higher root number leading to increased root biomass, with respect to IR64. It was observed that LS roots maintained higher level of H2O2 in comparison to IR64. The activities of various enzymes involved in enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanism (SOD, CAT, GPX, DHAR and MDHAR) were found to be greater in LS roots. Further, the higher transcript level accumulation of genes encoding ROS generating (RbohA, RbohD and RbohE) and scavenging enzymes (Fe-SOD, Chioroplastic Cu/Zn-SOD, CAT and DHAR) were noticed in the roots of tolerant cultivar, LS. Moreover, the content of other stress markers such as total protein and proline were also elevated in LS roots. While, the expression of proline biosynthesis gene (PSCS) and proline catabolism gene (PDH) was observed to be lower in LS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available