4.7 Article

What about the herb? A new metabolomics approach for synthetic cannabinoid drug testing

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 410, Issue 21, Pages 5107-5112

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1182-8

Keywords

Spice; Herbal components; Synthetic cannabinoids; Saliva biomarkers; Metabolomics; High-resolution mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. European Union [HOME/2014/JDRUG/AG/DRUG/7086]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [II 2014/023]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2015-65603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are consumed as legal alternative to cannabis and often allow passing drug-screening tests. Their rapid transience on the drug scene, combined with their mostly unknown metabolic profiles, creates a scenario with constantly moving analytical targets, making their monitoring and identification challenging. The development of fast screening strategies for SCs, not directly focused on their chemical structure, as an alternative to the commonly applied target acquisition methods, would be highly appreciated in forensic and public health laboratories. An innovative untargeted metabolomics approach, focused on herbal components commonly used for 'spice' products, was applied. Saliva samples of healthy volunteers were collected at pre-dose and after smoking herbal components and analysed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. The data obtained, combined with appropriate statistical analysis, allowed to highlight and elucidate two markers (scopoletin and N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)dodecylamine), which ratio permitted to differentiate herbal smokers from non-smokers. The proposed strategy will allow discriminating potential positives, on the basis of the analysis of two markers identified in the herbal blends. This work is presented as a step forward in SC drug testing, promoting a smart first-line screening approach, which will allow reducing the number of samples to be further investigated by more sophisticated HRMS methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available