4.7 Article

FractionOptimizer: a method for optimal peptide fractionation in bottom-up proteomics

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 410, Issue 16, Pages 3827-3833

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1054-2

Keywords

Proteomics; Peptide fractionation; Mass spectrometry; Bottom-up proteomics; Liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-14-00971]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [17-14-00076] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advances in mass spectrometry and separation technologies created the opportunities for deep proteome characterization using shotgun proteomics approaches. The real world sample complexity and high concentration range limit the sensitivity of this characterization. The common strategy for increasing the sensitivity is sample fractionation prior to analysis either at the protein or the peptide level. Typically, fractionation at the peptide level is performed using linear gradient high-performance liquid chromatography followed by uniform fraction collection. However, this way of peptide fractionation results in significantly suboptimal operation of the mass spectrometer due to the non-uniform distribution of peptides between the fractions. In this work, we propose an approach based on peptide retention time prediction allowing optimization of chromatographic conditions and fraction collection procedures. An open-source software implementing the approach called FractionOptimizer was developed and is available at http://hg.theorchromo.ru/FractionOptimizer. The performance of the developed tool was demonstrated for human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cell line lysate. In these experiments, we improved the uniformity of the peptides distribution between fractions. Moreover, in addition to 13,492 peptides, we found 6787 new peptides not identified in the experiments without fractionation and up to 800 new proteins (or 25%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available