4.6 Review

Nanocarrier-based antioxidant therapy: promise or delusion?

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 1783-1790

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2015.1063611

Keywords

antioxidant delivery; antioxidant therapy; clinical trials; oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Oxidative stress has generally been recognized as an important factor in the pathogenesis of human diseases, making antioxidant therapy a plausible strategy to either prevent or treat human disorders. Yet so far, numerous antioxidant-based clinical trials aimed at developing clinically approved protocols have been disappointing and many reasons for their failure are being discussed, including the limited bioavailability of most antioxidants. To overcome the hurdles associated with the direct administration of antioxidant molecules, a variety of nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems are being developed. All the strategies currently being explored, however, appear in our opinion to underappreciate the crucial role reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RO/NS) play in the regulation of the metabolome, as revealed by recent progress made in redox biology.Areas covered: We briefly review antioxidant-based clinical trials and discuss the functions of RO/NS as crucial intracellular messengers. We emphasize the probable existence of three distinct concentration levels of RO/NS: a physiological level reflecting their functions as messenger molecules, an elevated level crucial for activation of protective pathways and a toxic level causing oxidative damage to cellular components.Expert opinion: Site-specific, multifunctional nanodrug delivery systems able to sense the actual intracellular concentrations of RO/NS and release antioxidants accordingly in order to only neutralize the pathologic excess of RO/NS need to be developed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available