4.7 Article

NEUTRONIZATION DURING CARBON SIMMERING IN TYPE IA SUPERNOVA PROGENITORS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 825, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/57

Keywords

convection; methods: numerical; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; stars: evolution; supernovae: general; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. NASA ADAP grant [NNX15AM03G S01]
  2. NSF [AST-1205732]
  3. NASA [797808, NNX15AM03G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When a Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor first ignites carbon in its core, it undergoes similar to 10(3)-10(4) years of convective burning prior to the onset of thermonuclear runaway. This carbon simmering phase is important for setting the thermal profile and composition of the white dwarf. Using the MESA stellar evolution code, we follow this convective burning and examine the production of neutron-rich isotopes. The neutron content of the SN fuel has important consequences for the ensuing nucleosynthesis, and in particular, for the production of secondary Fe-peak nuclei like Mn and stable Ni. These elements have been observed in the X-ray spectra of SN remnants like Tycho, Kepler, and 3C 397, and their yields can provide valuable insights into the physics of SNe Ia and the properties of their progenitors. We find that weak reactions during simmering can at most generate a neutron excess of approximate to 3 x 10(-4). This is approximate to 70% lower than that found in previous studies that do not take the full density and temperature profile of the simmering region into account. Our results imply that the progenitor metallicity is the main contributor to the neutron excess in SN Ia fuel for Z greater than or similar to 1/3 Z(circle dot). Alternatively, at lower metallicities, this neutron excess provides a floor that should be present in any centrally-ignited SN. Ia scenario.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available