4.3 Review

Harnessing the immune system to improve cancer therapy

Journal

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.04.01

Keywords

Cancer immunotherapy; checkpoint inhibitors; dendritic cells (DCs); monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); peptide vaccines

Funding

  1. European Union FP7 Capacities grant INsPiRE [REGPOT-CT-2011-284460]
  2. IKY Fellowships of Excellence for Postgraduate Studies in Greece-Siemens

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer immunotherapy uses the immune system and its components to mount an anti-tumor response. During the last decade, it has evolved from a promising therapy option to a robust clinical reality. Many immunotherapeutic modalities are already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating cancer patients and many others are in the pipeline for approval as standalone or combinatorial therapeutic interventions, several also combined with standard treatments in clinical studies. The two main axes of cancer immunotherapeutics refer to passive and active treatments. Prominent examples of passive immunotherapy include administration of monoclonal antibodies and cytokines and adoptive cell transfer of ex vivo educated immune cells. Active immunotherapy refers, among others, to anti-cancer vaccines [peptide, dendritic cell (DC)-based and allogeneic whole cell vaccines], immune checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic viruses, whereas new approaches that can further enhance anti-cancer immune responses are also widely explored. Herein, we present the most popular cancer immunotherapy approaches and discuss their clinical relevance referring to data acquired from clinical trials. To date, clinical experience and efficacy suggest that combining more than one immunotherapy interventions, in conjunction with other treatment options like chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted or epigenetic therapy, should guide the way to cancer cure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available