4.3 Review

Challenges in engineering osteochondral tissue grafts with hierarchical structures

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 1583-1599

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1070825

Keywords

anatomical shape; biomimetics; osteochondral grafts; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of Serbia [ON174028, III41007]
  2. National Institutes of Health [DE016525, EB002520, AR061988]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: A major hurdle in treating osteochondral (OC) defects is the different healing abilities of two types of tissues involved - articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Biomimetic approaches to OC-construct engineering, based on recapitulation of biological principles of tissue development and regeneration, have potential for providing new treatments and advancing fundamental studies of OC tissue repair. Areas covered: This review on state of the art in hierarchical OC tissue graft engineering is focused on tissue engineering approaches designed to recapitulate the native milieu of cartilage and bone development. These biomimetic systems are discussed with relevance to bioreactor cultivation of clinically sized, anatomically shaped human cartilage/bone constructs with physiologic stratification and mechanical properties. The utility of engineered OC tissue constructs is evaluated for their use as grafts in regenerative medicine, and as high-fidelity models in biological research. Expert opinion: A major challenge in engineering OC tissues is to generate a functionally integrated stratified cartilage-bone structure starting from one single population of mesenchymal cells, while incorporating perfusable vasculature into the bone, and in bone-cartilage interface. To this end, new generations of advanced scaffolds and bioreactors, implementation of mechanical loading regimens and harnessing of inflammatory responses of the host will likely drive the further progress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available