4.6 Article

The Power of the Like in Adolescence: Effects of Peer Influence on Neural and Behavioral Responses to Social Media

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 1027-1035

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0956797616645673

Keywords

adolescent development; social cognition; social influences; risk taking; neuroimaging; open materials

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [C06-RR012169, C06-RR015431]
  2. Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [S10-OD011939]
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse National Research Service Award [F31-DA038578-01A1]
  4. Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization
  5. Brain Mapping Support Foundation
  6. Pierson-Lovelace Foundation
  7. Ahmanson Foundation
  8. Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation
  9. William M. and Linda R. Dietel Philanthropic Fund
  10. Northstar Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated a unique way in which adolescent peer influence occurs on social media. We developed a novel functional MRI (fMRI) paradigm to simulate Instagram, a popular social photo-sharing tool, and measured adolescents' behavioral and neural responses to likes, a quantifiable form of social endorsement and potential source of peer influence. Adolescents underwent fMRI while viewing photos ostensibly submitted to Instagram. They were more likely to like photos depicted with many likes than photos with few likes; this finding showed the influence of virtual peer endorsement and held for both neutral photos and photos of risky behaviors (e.g., drinking, smoking). Viewing photos with many (compared with few) likes was associated with greater activity in neural regions implicated in reward processing, social cognition, imitation, and attention. Furthermore, when adolescents viewed risky photos (as opposed to neutral photos), activation in the cognitive-control network decreased. These findings highlight possible mechanisms underlying peer influence during adolescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available