4.3 Article

PEGylated IFHβ-1a in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 1077-1084

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1053206

Keywords

drug evaluation; IFN; multiple sclerosis; PEGIFN beta-1aPEGylated; relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis; review

Funding

  1. Biogen Idec
  2. Bayer-Schering
  3. Merck Serono
  4. Novartis
  5. Sanofi-Pasteur
  6. MSD
  7. Teva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the CNS characterized in most cases by a relapsing and remitting disease course, often followed by a progressive course. There are many available injectable therapies for the relapsing-remitting form of MS (RRMS); however, efficacy can be affected by poor adherence and compliance, and an increased frequency of side effects as a result of frequent injections is seen. Areas covered: This review focuses on the use of subcutaneous PEGylated IFN beta-1a (PEGIFN beta-1a) in RRMS. The pharmacological data in addition to clinical safety and tolerability are analyzed. The clinical efficacy is assessed by evaluating results of various end points used in the ADVANCE Phase III study and the differences between treatment groups over 2 years. Expert opinion: We discuss the significance of the ADVANCE trial results and how the results compare to other products on the market. Due to a lack of head-to-head comparison of PEGIFN beta-1a with other types of drugs for RRMS, it is difficult to draw conclusion about the superiority of the drug. We also discuss whether the results can be applied to patients with more severe forms of the disease. Overall, PEGIFN beta-1a is a promising addition to the repertoire of emerging drugs for the treatment of RRMS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available