4.4 Article

Inferring Causalities in Landscape Genetics: An Extension of Wright's Causal Modeling to Distance Matrices

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 191, Issue 4, Pages 491-508

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/696233

Keywords

causal modeling; landscape genetics; path analysis; d-sep test; pairwise data

Funding

  1. Laboratoire d'Excellence TULIP [ANR-10-LABX-41]
  2. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche PhD scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying landscape features that affect functional connectivity among populations is a major challenge in fundamental and applied sciences. Landscape genetics combines landscape and genetic data to address this issue, with the main objective of disentangling direct and indirect relationships among an intricate set of variables. Causal modeling has strong potential to address the complex nature of landscape genetic data sets. However, this statistical approach was not initially developed to address the pairwise distance matrices commonly used in landscape genetics. Here, we aimed to extend the applicability of two causal modeling methodsthat is, maximum-likelihood path analysis and the directional separation testby developing statistical approaches aimed at handling distance matrices and improving functional connectivity inference. Using simulations, we showed that these approaches greatly improved the robustness of the absolute (using a frequentist approach) and relative (using an information-theoretic approach) fits of the tested models. We used an empirical data set combining genetic information on a freshwater fish species (Gobio occitaniae) and detailed landscape descriptors to demonstrate the usefulness of causal modeling to identify functional connectivity in wild populations. Specifically, we demonstrated how direct and indirect relationships involving altitude, temperature, and oxygen concentration influenced within- and between-population genetic diversity of G. occitaniae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available