4.5 Article

Calcified Neurocysticercosis and Headache in an Endemic Village: A Case-Control Study Nested to a Population-Based Cohort

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 729-734

Publisher

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0310

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Universidad Espiritu Santo, Ecuador

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Headache in patients with calcified neurocysticercosis (NCC) is probably common but has been largely overlooked. We aimed to assess the presence, characteristics, and diagnosis of headache across patients with calcified NCC and their matched controls. In this case-control study nested to a population-based cohort, Atahualpa residents aged (3) 20 years with calcified NCC were identified as case patients and paired 1: 1 to age-and gender-matched randomly selected controls. A culturally adapted questionnaire was derived from the EUROLIGHT. Headache diagnosis was established according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Conditional logistic regression models for matched paired data were fitted to assess the independent association between calcifiedNCC(as the exposure) and headache variables, after adjusting for education, alcohol intake, depression, and epilepsy. The selection process generated 106 case patients and their matched controls. Lifetime headache prevalence (odds ratio [OR]: 4.18; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.79-9.75; P = 0.001), current headaches (OR: 4.19; 95% CI: 1.92-9.16; P < 0.001), and intense headaches (OR: 9.47; 95% CI: 2.88-31.19; P < 0.001) were more frequent among cases than in controls. In addition, migraine (but not other forms of headache) was more frequent among subjects with calcified NCC (OR: 4.89; 95% CI: 2.36-11.39; P < 0.001). This study shows a robust epidemiological association between headache-particularly migraine-and calcified NCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available