4.6 Article

Allograft and patient survival after sequential HSCT and kidney transplantation from the same donorA multicenter analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 475-487

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14970

Keywords

bone marrow; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; clinical research; practice; kidney (allograft) function; dysfunction; kidney transplantation; nephrology; tolerance: clinical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tolerance induction through simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell and renal transplantation has shown promising results, but it is hampered by the toxicity of preconditioning therapies and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Moreover, renal function has never been compared to conventionally transplanted patients, thus, whether donor-specific tolerance results in improved outcomes remains unanswered. We collected follow-up data of published cases of renal transplantations after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the same donor and compared patient and transplant kidney survival as well as function with caliper-matched living-donor renal transplantations from the Austrian dialysis and transplant registry. Overall, 22 tolerant and 20 control patients were included (median observation period 10years [range 11months to 26years]). In the tolerant group, no renal allograft loss was reported, whereas 3 were lost in the control group. Median creatinine levels were 85mol/l (interquartile range [IQR] 72-99) in the tolerant cohort and 118mol/l (IQR 99-143) in the control group. Mixed linear-model showed around 29% lower average creatinine levels throughout follow-up in the tolerant group (P<.01). Our data clearly show stable renal graft function without long-term immunosuppression for many years, suggesting permanent donor-specific tolerance. Thus sequential transplantation might be an alternative approach for future studies targeting tolerance induction in renal allograft recipients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available