4.4 Article

The Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program (SSTEP): A comprehensive simulation-based surgical skills initiative for preclerkship medical students

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 216, Issue 2, Pages 375-381

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.012

Keywords

Preclerkship; Medical education; Surgical bootcamp; Technical skill; OSATS

Categories

Funding

  1. Undergraduate Medical Education Program at Queen's University, Kingston Ontario
  2. Faculty of Health Sciences at Queen's University, Kingston Ontario
  3. Department of Surgery at Queen's University, Kingston Ontario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Surgical Skills and Technology Elective Program (SSTEP) is a voluntary preclerkship surgical bootcamp that uses simulation learning to build procedural knowledge and technical skills before clerkship. Methods: Eighteen second year students (n = 18) participated in simulation workshops over the course of 7 days to learn clerkship-level procedural skills. A manual was supplied with the program outline. Assessment of the participants involved: 1) a written exam 2) a single videotaped Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) station 3) an exit survey to document changes in career choices. Results: Compared to the mean written pre-test score students scored significantly higher on the written post-test (35.83 +/- 6.56 vs. 52.11 +/- 5.95 out of 73) (p = 0.01). Technical skill on the OSATS station demonstrated improved performance and confidence following the program (10.10 vs. 17.94 out of 25) (p = 0.05). Most participants (72%) re-considered their choices of surgical electives. Conclusions: A preclerkship surgical skills program not only stimulates interest in surgery but can also improve surgical knowledge and technical skills prior to clerkship. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available