4.6 Article

MULTI-SPECIES MEASUREMENTS OF THE FIREHOSE AND MIRROR INSTABILITY THRESHOLDS IN THE SOLAR WIND

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 825, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L26

Keywords

instabilities; plasmas; solar wind

Funding

  1. Imperial College Junior Research Fellowship
  2. STFC grant [ST/K001051/1]
  3. Marie Curie Project FP7-Turboplasmas [PIRSES-2010-269297]
  4. EPSRC [EP/M022331/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. STFC [ST/F002505/2, ST/N000919/1, ST/K001051/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M022331/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N000919/1, ST/F002505/2, ST/K001051/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The firehose and mirror instabilities are thought to arise in a variety of space and astrophysical plasmas, constraining the pressure anisotropies and drifts between particle species. The plasma stability depends on all species simultaneously, meaning that a combined analysis is required. Here, we present the first such analysis in the solar wind, using the long-wavelength stability parameters to combine the anisotropies and drifts of all major species (core and beam protons, alphas, and electrons). At the threshold, the firehose parameter was found to be dominated by protons (67%), but also to have significant contributions from electrons (18%) and alphas (15%). Drifts were also found to be important, contributing 57% in the presence of a proton beam. A similar situation was found for the mirror, with contributions of 61%, 28%, and 11% for protons, electrons, and alphas, respectively. The parallel electric field contribution, however, was found to be small at 9%. Overall, the long-wavelength thresholds constrain the data well (< 1% unstable), and the implications of this are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available