4.3 Article

Lateral septum growth hormone secretagogue receptor affects food intake and motivation for sucrose reinforcement

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00339.2017

Keywords

ghrelin; food intake; food reward; lateral septum

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01-DK-095757, F31-DK-115102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hormone ghrelin promotes eating and is widely considered to be a hunger signal. Ghrelin receptors, growth hormone secretagogue receptors (GHSRs), are found in a number of specific regions throughout the brain, including the lateral septum (LS), an area not traditionally associated with the control of feeding. Here we investigated whether GHSRs in the LS play a role in the control of food intake. We examined the feeding effects of ghrelin and the GHSR antagonists ([D-Lys(3)]-growth hormone-releasing peptide-6 and JMV-2959) at doses subthreshold for effect when delivered to the lateral ventricle. Intra-LS ghrelin significantly increased chow intake during the midlight phase, suggesting that pharmacological activation of LS GHSRs promotes feeding. Conversely. GHSR antagonist delivered to the LS shortly before dark onset significantly reduced chow intake. These data support the hypothesis that exogenous and endogenous stimulation of GHSRs in the LS influence feeding. Ghrelin is known to affect motivation for food, and the dorsal subdivision of LS (dLS) has been shown to play a role in motivation. Thus, we investigated the role of dLS GHSRs in motivation for food reward by examining operant responding for sucrose on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule. Intra-dLS ghrelin increased PR responding for sucrose, whereas blockade of LS GHSRs did not affect responding in either a fed or fasted state. Together these findings for the first time substantiate the LS as a site of action for ghrelin signaling in the control of food intake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available