4.4 Article

Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer Interaction: Effects of Message Interactivity on User Engagement

Journal

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 595-625

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0093650214534962

Keywords

message interactivity; interactivity effects; message contingency; user engagement; interaction history; live chat; Chatbot; search engine

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [IIS-0916944]
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation under the WCU (World Class University) program through the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, S. Korea [R31-2008-000-10062-0]
  3. Ministry of Education, Korea, under the Brain Korea 21 Plus Project [10Z20130000013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical determinant of message interactivity is the presence of contingency, that is, the messages we receive are contingent upon the messages we send, leading to a threaded loop of interdependent messages. While this conversational ideal is easily achieved in face-to-face and computer-mediated communications (CMC), imbuing contingency in human-computer interaction (HCI) is a challenge. We propose two interface featuresinteraction history and synchronous chatfor increasing perceptions of contingency, and therefore user engagement. We test it with a five-condition, between-participants experiment (N = 110) on a movie search site. Data suggest that interaction history can indeed heighten perceptions of contingency and dialogue, but is perceived as less interactive than chatting. However, the chat function does not appreciably increase perceived contingency or user engagement, both of which are shown to mediate the effects of message interactivity on attitudes toward the site. Theoretical implications for interactivity research and practical implications for interaction design are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available