4.7 Article

Vacuum stability and radiative electroweak symmetry breaking in an SO(10) dark matter model

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 93, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.111703

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN's Consolider-Ingenio Programme [Multi-Dark CSD2009-00064]
  2. LIA-TCAP of CNRS
  3. France-US PICS [06482]
  4. European Union FP7 ITN INVISIBLES (Marie Curie Actions) [PITN-GA-2011-289442]
  5. ERC advanced grants Higgs@LHC
  6. DOE Grant at the University of Minnesota [DE-SC0011842]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vacuum stability in the Standard Model is problematic as the Higgs quartic self-coupling runs negative at a renormalization scale of about 10(10) GeV. We consider a nonsupersymmetric SO(10) grand unification model for which gauge coupling unification is made possible through an intermediate scale gauge group, G(int) = SU(3)(C) circle times SU(2)(L) circle times SU(2)(R) circle times U(1)(B-L). G(int) is broken by the vacuum expectation value of a 126 of SO(10) which not only provides for neutrino masses through the seesaw mechanism but also preserves a discrete Z(2) that can account for the stability of a dark matter candidate, here taken to be the Standard Model singlet component of a bosonic 16. We show that in addition to these features the model insures the positivity of the Higgs quartic coupling through its interactions to the dark matter multiplet and 126. We also show that the Higgs mass squared runs negative, triggering electroweak symmetry breaking. Thus, the vacuum stability is achieved along with radiative electroweak symmetry breaking and captures two more important elements of supersymmetric models without low-energy supersymmetry. The conditions for perturbativity of quartic couplings and for radiative electroweak symmetry breaking lead to tight upper and lower limits on the dark matter mass, respectively, and this dark matter mass region (1.35-2 TeV) can be probed in future direct detection experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available