4.6 Article

Charge carrier effective mass and concentration derived from combination of Seebeck coefficient and 125Te NMR measurements in complex tellurides

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 93, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245202

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science and Engineering Division
  2. U.S. DOE by Iowa State University [AC02-07CH11358]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermoelectric materials utilize the Seebeck effect to convert heat to electrical energy. The Seebeck coefficient (thermopower), S, depends on the free (mobile) carrier concentration, n, and effective mass, m*, as S similar to m*/n(2/3). The carrier concentration in tellurides can be derived from Te-125 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spinlattice relaxation measurements. The NMR spin-lattice relaxation rate, 1/T-1, depends on both n and m* as 1/T-1 similar to (m*)(3)/(2)n (within classical Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics) or as 1/T-1 similar to (m*)(2)n(2/3) (within quantum Fermi-Dirac statistics), which challenges the correct determination of the carrier concentration in some materials by NMR. Here it is shown that the combination of the Seebeck coefficient and Te-125 NMR spin-lattice relaxation measurements in complex tellurides provides a unique opportunity to derive the carrier effective mass and then to calculate the carrier concentration. This approach was used to study AgxSbxGe50-2xTe50, well-known GeTe-based high-efficiency tellurium-antimony-germanium-silver thermoelectric materials, where the replacement of Ge by [Ag+Sb] results in significant enhancement of the Seebeck coefficient. Values of both m* and n derived using this combination show that the enhancement of thermopower can be attributed primarily to an increase of the carrier effective mass and partially to a decrease of the carrier concentration when the [Ag+Sb] content increases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available