4.5 Article

Patient- and hospital-level predictors of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia in Ontario, Canada

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
Volume 46, Issue 11, Pages 1266-1271

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.05.003

Keywords

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; VRE; Bacieremia; Risk factors

Funding

  1. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Data are limited on risk factors for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcris (VRE) bacteremia. Methods: All patients with a confirmed VRE bacteremia in Ontario, Canada, between January 2009 and December 2013 were linked to provincial healthcare administrative data sources and frequency matched to 3 controls based on age, sex, and aggregated diagnosis group. Associations between predictors and VRE bacteremia were estimated by generalized estimating equations and summarized using odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In total, 217 cases and 651 controls were examined. In adjusted analyses, patient-level predictors included bone marrow transplant (OR 106.99 [95% CI 12.19-939.26]): solid organ transplant (OR 17.17 [95% CI 4.95-59.54]): any cancer (OR 8.64 [95% CI 3.88-19.211): intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR 6.81 [95% CI 3.53-13.13]): heart disease (OR 5.27 [95% CI 2.00-13.90]): and longer length of stay (OR 1.07 per day [95% CI 1.06-1.09]). Hospital-level predictors included hospital size (per increase in 100 beds (OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.07-1.48]) and teaching hospitals (OR 3.87 [95% CI 1.85-8.08]). Conclusions: Patients with a bone marrow transplant, solid organ transplant, cancer, or who are admitted to the ICU are at highest risk of VRE bacteremia, particularly at large hospitals and teaching hospitals. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available