4.6 Article

Ibrutinib discontinuation in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia: Etiologies, outcomes, and IgM rebound

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages 511-517

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25023

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. WMR Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ibrutinib is the first approved therapy for symptomatic patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM). The reasons for discontinuing ibrutinib and subsequent outcomes have not been previously evaluated in WM patients. We therefore conducted a retrospective review of 189 WM patients seen at our institution who received treatment with ibrutinib, of whom 51 (27%) have discontinued therapy. Reasons for discontinuation include: disease progression (n = 27; 14%), toxicity (n = 15; 8%), nonresponse (n = 5; 3%), and other unrelated reasons (n = 4; 2%). The cumulative incidence of ibrutinib discontinuation at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months from treatment initiation was 22%, 26%, 35%, and 43%, respectively. A baseline platelet count <= 100 K/mL and presence of tumor CXCR4 mutations were independently associated with 4-fold increased odds of ibrutinib discontinuation. An IgM rebound (>= 25% increase in serum IgM) was observed in 37 patients (73%) following ibrutinib discontinuation and occurred within 4 weeks for nearly half of patients. The response rate to salvage therapy was 71%; responses were higher in patients without an IgM rebound and when salvage therapy was initiated within 2 weeks of stopping ibrutinib. Patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to disease progression versus nonprogression events had significantly shorter overall survival (21 versus 32 months; P = .046). Response to salvage therapy was associated with an 82% reduction in the risk of death following ibrutinib discontinuation. WM patients who discontinue ibrutinib require close monitoring, and continuation of ibrutinib until the next therapy should be considered to maintain disease control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available