3.8 Review

The early development and application of FTIR difference spectroscopy to membrane proteins: A personal perspective

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SPECTROSCOPY AND IMAGING
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 231-267

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/BSI-160148

Keywords

Infrared spectroscopy; FTIR difference spectroscopy; Raman spectroscopy; retinal; rhodopsin; bacteriorhodopsin; membrane proteins

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Army Research Office
  4. American Heart Association
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1264434] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Membrane proteins facilitate some of the most important cellular processes including energy conversion, ion transport and signal transduction. While conventional infrared absorption provides information about membrane protein secondary structure, a major challenge is to develop a dynamic picture of the functioning of membrane proteins at the molecular level. The introduction of FTIR difference spectroscopy around 1980 to study structural changes in membrane proteins along with a number of associated techniques including protein isotope labeling, site-directed mutagenesis, polarization dichroism, attenuated total reflection and time-resolved spectroscopy have led to significant progress towards this goal. It is now possible to routinely detect conformational changes of individual amino acid residues, backbone peptides, binding ligands, chromophores and even internal water molecules under physiological conditions with time-resolution down to nanoseconds. The advent of ultrafast pulsed-IR lasers has pushed this time-resolution down to femtoseconds. The early development of FTIR difference spectroscopy as applied to membrane proteins with special focus on bacteriorhodopsin is reviewed from a personal perspective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available