4.6 Article

Identification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Axes That Predict All-Cause Mortality The COPDGene Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 187, Issue 10, Pages 2109-2116

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy087

Keywords

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Cox proportional hazards; factor analysis; mortality

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL089897, R01 HL089856, K08 HL097029]
  2. COPD Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a syndrome caused by damage to the lungs that results in decreased pulmonary function and reduced structural integrity. Pulmonary function testing (PFT) is used to diagnose and stratify COPD into severity groups, and computed tomography (CT) imaging of the chest is often used to assess structural changes in the lungs. We hypothesized that the combination of PFT and CT phenotypes would provide a more powerful tool for assessing underlying morphologic differences associated with pulmonary function in COPD than does PFT alone. We used factor analysis of 26 variables to classify 8,157 participants recruited into the COPDGene cohort between January 2008 and June 2011 from 21 clinical centers across the United States. These factors were used as predictors of all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Five factors explained 80% of the covariance and represented the following domains: factor 1, increased emphysema and decreased pulmonary function; factor 2, airway disease and decreased pulmonary function; factor 3, gas trapping; factor 4, CT variability; and factor 5, hyperinflation. After more than 46,079 person-years of follow-up, factors 1 through 4 were associated with mortality and there was a significant synergistic interaction between factors 1 and 2 on death. Considering CT measures along with PFT in the assessment of COPD can identify patients at particularly high risk for death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available