4.8 Article

Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China's agricultural sector: A meta-frontier approach

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 25-34

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.012

Keywords

Agricultural sector; Meta-frontier DEA; Malmquist index approach; Energy efficiency; Technological heterogeneity

Funding

  1. Newhuadu Business School Research Fund
  2. Grant for Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy [1260-Z0210011]
  3. Xiamen University Flourish Plan Special Funding [1260-Y07200]
  4. Ministry of Education [10JBG013]
  5. Social Science Planning Project of Fujian Province [FJ2015C235]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following agricultural technological heterogeneity, we employ the meta-frontier DEA method to measure agricultural energy efficiency in China's agricultural sector, and then use Malmquist index approach to explore the energy productivity change. The results show that agricultural energy efficiency is quite low and has the characteristics of regional differences. The energy efficiency of eastern coastal regions is significantly higher than that of the western interior. The energy efficiency loss comes mainly from managerial inefficiency rather than technology gap on the whole. The Malmquist index reveals that agricultural energy productivity has improved in general, mainly due to technological advancements while the deterioration in agricultural energy productivity is due to reduction in technical efficiency. We suggest that technological innovation and managerial efficiency should be promoted to increase energy efficiency and more attention should be paid to the western region to balance the regional difference. The findings are of great significance to energy conservation and sustainable development in China's agricultural sector. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available