4.7 Article

The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association Framework on Alzheimer's disease: Application to clinical trials

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 172-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.006

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Clinical trials; NIA-AA Framework; Biomarkers; Disease modification; Amyloid; Tau; Neurodegeneration

Funding

  1. COBRE grant from the NIH/NIGMS [P20GM109025]
  2. Keep Memory Alive
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM109025] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association Research Framework on Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents an important advance in the biological characterization of the AD spectrum. Methods: The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association Framework is considered as it applies to clinical trials. Results: Using the combination of amyloid (A), tau (T), and neurodegeneration (N) biomarkers, the Framework provides a means of defining the state of patients with regard to Alzheimer pathologic change. The Framework is relevant to clinical trials of disease-modifying agents, allowing participants to be characterized biologically at baseline. The ATN Framework can also inform trial outcomes. The preclinical phase of the disease after amyloid deposition is defined by A+T-N-, and the transition to prodromal disease and dementia is characterized by the addition of T and N. Most symptomatic patients in clinical trials are in the class of A+T+N- and A+T+N+. Discussion: The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association Framework on AD represents progress in providing biomarker profiles of participants in the AD spectrum that can be used to help design clinical trials. (C) 2018 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Alzheimer's Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available