Journal
AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 64, Issue 10, Pages 3565-3581Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16341
Keywords
fluidization; computational fluid dynamics; coarse-grid simulation; mesoscale solid stress; MFIX
Categories
Funding
- U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office
- DOE
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study focused on assessing the effect of mesoscale solid stress in the coarse grid two-fluid model (TFM) simulation of gas-solid fluidized beds of Geldart Group A particles over a broad range of flow regimes, including bubbling, turbulent, fast, and pneumatic transport fluidization regimes. Particularly, the impact of mesoscale solid pressure, mesoscale solid viscosity, and mesoscale solid stress anisotropy were investigated by comparing six different coarse-grid TFM settings. Compared with the available experimental data, it is found that both the kinetic theory-based TFM with only drag correction and the filtered TFM can predict the flow behavior in all fluidization regimes. Mesoscale solid pressure and viscosity have the opposite impact on flow hydrodynamics; they compete and offset each other, which confirms the assumption employed in many previous studies that the mesoscale solid stress could be neglected in coarse-grid TFM simulation. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. AIChE J, 64: 3565-3581, 2018
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available