4.6 Article

Validation Study on Spatially Averaged Two-Fluid Model for Gas-Solid Flows: II. Application to Risers and Fluidized Beds

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 1606-1617

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16141

Keywords

cluster induced turbulence; multiphase turbulence; turbulent kinetic energy; kinetic theory based two-fluid model; coarse-grid simulations

Funding

  1. Christian-Doppler Research Association
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth
  3. Austrian National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development
  4. K1MET center for metallurgical research in Austria
  5. Osterreichische Forschungsforderungsgesellschaft
  6. Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In our prior study (Schneiderbauer, AIChE J. 2017;63(8):3544-3562), a spatially averaged two-fluid model (SA-TFM) was presented, where closure models for the unresolved terms were derived. These closures require constitutive relations for the turbulent kinetic energies of the gas and solids phase as well as for the subfilter variance of the solids volume fraction. We had ascertained that the filtered model do yield nearly the same time-averaged macroscale flow behavior in bubbling fluidized beds as the underlying kinetic-theory-based two-fluid model, thus verifying the SA-TFM model approach. In the present study, a set of 3D computational simulations for validation of the SA-TFM against the experimental data on riser flow and bubbling fluidized beds is performed. Finally, the SA-TFM predictions are in fairly good agreement with experimental data in the case of Geldart A and B particles even though using very coarse grids. (C) 2018 The Authors AIChE Journal published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available