4.5 Article

Muscle activity during daily life in the older people

Journal

AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 713-720

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-015-0482-5

Keywords

Physical activity; Electromyography; Independent living; Energy expenditure; Aging

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [128643]
  2. Urheiluopistosaatio
  3. Ellen and Artturi Nyyssosen saatio
  4. Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [128643, 128643] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Daily muscle activity is important for functional independence. This study examined muscle activity patterns during normal daily life and simulated daily tasks and compared muscle activity and energy consumption during active and passive transport tasks in older adults. Methods Nine volunteers (70 +/- 6 years) were measured for quadriceps and hamstring muscle activity (EMG) during normal daily life, treadmill walking, and during passive and active transport tasks. EMG was normalized to that recorded during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Oxygen uptake (VO2) was measured during treadmill and transport tasks. Results During daily life the mean EMG amplitude was 5.9 +/- 2.4 % of EMG(MVC), activity time was 187 +/- 43 min and the longest continuous inactivity periods were 20.9 +/- 10.0 min. During stair ascend the peak EMG activity was 120 % of EMG(MVC) and the peak VO2 values were only about 70 % of VO2max. One kilometer walk consumed 3.5 times more energy than passive transport by bus, and using stairs consumed 11.7 times more energy than using an elevator. Conclusions In daily life, older adults use only a small fraction of muscle's maximal capacity and have long continuous inactivity periods. Negotiating stairs produce significant load to neuromuscular, but not to cardiovascular system, thus providing an effective strength training stimulus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available