4.5 Article

Numerical Investigation of Transitional Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction in Supersonic Regime

Journal

AIAA JOURNAL
Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 2712-2724

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.J056650

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Scientific Independence of young Researchers program - Ministero dell'Istruzione dell'Universita e della Ricerca [RBSI14TKWU]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct numerical simulations of shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions are performed at Mach number M-infinity=1.7 to investigate the influence of the state of the incoming boundary layer on the interaction properties. Four shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction cases are considered, corresponding to transitional and turbulent interactions for two different shock strengths, corresponding to flow-deflection angles phi=3 deg and phi=6 deg. It is found that significant separation is not evident in the mean flow of any interaction; the boundary layer remains attached at phi=3 deg and close to incipient separation at phi=6 deg, independent of the state of the incoming boundary layer. The extent of the interaction is larger for the transitional flow cases, characterized by a wider spreading of the wall pressure rise and a slower boundary-layer recovery. The scaling analysis for the interaction length scale L developed by Souverein etal. (A Scaling Analysis for Turbulent Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol.714, January 2013, pp.505-535) for turbulent interactions is found to be equally applicable for the transitional interactions. The wall-pressure spectra show that the dominant frequency range is that associated with the most energetic structures of the incoming boundary layer, and no evidence of low-frequency shock unsteadiness is noticed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available