4.7 Article

ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF CIRCUMSTELLAR DISKS IN THE UPPER SCORPIUS OB ASSOCIATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 827, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/142

Keywords

open clusters and associations: individual (Upper Scorpius OB1); protoplanetary disks; stars: premain sequence

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1109334, AST-1140063]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1535809] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present ALMA observations of 106 G-, K-, and M-type stars in the Upper Scorpius OB Association hosting circumstellar disks. With these data, we measure the 0.88 mm continuum and (CO)-C-12 J = 3-2 line fluxes of disks around low-mass (0.14-1.66 M-circle dot) stars at an age of 5-11 Myr. Of the 75 primordial disks in the sample, 53 are detected in the dust continuum and 26 in CO. Of the 31 disks classified as debris/evolved transitional disks, five are detected in the continuum and none in CO. The lack of CO emission in approximately half of the disks with detected continuum emission can be explained if CO is optically thick but has a compact emitting area (less than or similar to 40 au), or if the CO is heavily depleted by a factor of at least similar to 1000 relative to interstellar medium abundances and is optically thin. The continuum measurements are used to estimate the dust mass of the disks. We find a correlation between disk dust mass and stellar host mass consistent with a power-law relation of M-dust alpha M-*(1.67 +/- 0.37). Disk dust masses in Upper Sco are compared to those measured in the younger Taurus star-forming region to constrain the evolution of disk dust mass. We find that the difference in the mean of log (M-dust/M-*) between Taurus and Upper Sco is 0.64 +/- 0.09, such that M-dust/M-* is lower in Upper Sco by a factor of similar to 4.5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available