4.5 Article

Of mice, pigs and humans: An analysis of mitochondrial phospholipids from mammals with very different maximal lifespans

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 135-143

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.011

Keywords

Peroxidation; Docosahexaenoic acid; Membrane pacemaker; Shotgun lipidomics

Funding

  1. Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI)
  2. Australian Research Council [FT110100249]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT110100249] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The maximal lifespan (MIS) of mammals is inversely correlated with the peroxidation index, a measure of the proportion and level of unsaturation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUPA) in membranes. This relationship is likely related to the fact that PUPA are highly susceptible to damage by peroxidation. Previous comparative work has examined membrane composition at the level of fatty acids, and relatively little is known regarding the distribution of PUPA across phospholipid classes or phospholipid molecules. In addition, data for humans is extremely rare in this area. Here we present the first shotgun lipidomics analysis of mitochondrial membranes and the peroxidation index of skeletal muscle, liver, and brain in three mammals that span the range of mammalian longevity. The species compared were mice (MLS of 4 years), pigs (MIS of 27 years), and humans (MIS of 122 years). Mouse mitochondria contained highly unsaturated PUPA in all phospholipid classes. Human mitochondria had lower PUFA content and a lower degree of unsaturation of PUPA. Pig mitochondria shared characteristics of both mice and humans. We found that membrane susceptibility to peroxidation was primarily determined by a limited number of phospholipid molecules that differed between both tissues and species. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available