4.7 Article

Simple models to predict grassland ecosystem C exchange and actual evapotranspiration using NDVI and environmental variables

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 249, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.007

Keywords

NDVI; Ecosystem C exchange; Grassland; Model; Precipitation frequency

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB-0823405, DEB-1027319]
  2. USDA-ARS Global Change Research Program
  3. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) UV-B Monitoring and Research Program [2015-34263-24070, 2016-34263-25763]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1419526] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1419526] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. NIFA [2015-34263-24070, 2016-34263-25763, 914135, 810330] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semiarid grasslands contribute significantly to net terrestrial carbon flux as plant productivity and heterotrophic respiration in these moisture-limited systems are correlated with metrics related to water availability (e.g., precipitation, Actual EvapoTranspiration or AET). These variables are also correlated with remotely sensed metrics such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). We used measurements of growing season net ecosystem exchange of carbon (NEE), NDVI from eMODIS and AVHRR, precipitation, and volumetric soil water content (VSWC) from grazed pastures in the semiarid, shortgrass steppe to quantify the correlation of NEE with these driving variables. eMODIS NDVI explained 60 and 40% of the variability in daytime and nighttime NEE, respectively, on non-rain days; these correlations were reduced to 41 and 15%, respectively, on rain days. Daytime NEE was almost always negative (sink) on non-rain days but positive on most rain days. In contrast, nighttime NEE was always positive (source), across rain and non-rain days. A model based on eMODIS NDVI, VSWC, daytime vs. nighttime, and rain vs. non-rain days explained 48% of observed variability in NEE at a daily scale; this increased to 62% and 77%, respectively, at the weekly and monthly scales. eMODIS NDVI explained 50-52% of the variability in AET regardless of rain or non-rain days. A model based on eMODIS NDVI, VSWC, Potential EvapoTranspiration (or PET), and rain vs. non-rain days explained 70% of the observed variability in AET at a daily scale; this increased to 90 and 96%, respectively, at weekly and monthly scales. Models based on AVHRR NDVI showed similar patterns as those using eMODIS, but correlations with observations were lower. We conclude that remotely-sensed NDVI is a robust tool, when combined with VSWC and knowledge of rain events, for predicting NEE and AET across multiple temporal scales (day to season) in semiarid grasslands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available