4.5 Article

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Urban Street Dust of Huanggang, Central China: Status, Sources and Human Health Risk Assessment

Journal

AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 221-233

Publisher

TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.02.0048

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Street dust; Source analysis; Health risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0212602]
  2. Hubei Universities of Outstanding Young Scientific and Technological Innovation Team Plans [T201729]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41603117]
  4. Outstanding Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team Projects of Hubei Polytechnic University [13xtz07]
  5. Special Scientific Research Funds for National Basic Research Program of China [2013FY112700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twenty-one street dust samples were collected in Huanggang City, Hubei Province, Central China Sixteen priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Concentrations of Sigma(16)PAHs ranged from 622.97 mu g kg(-1) to 4340.67 mu g kg(-1) with an average of 1862.10 mu g kg(-1). Among these PAHs, high-molecular-weight PAHs (four to six rings), which are the predominant PAH contributors in street dust, accounted for 55%-73% of the total PAHs. Mean concentrations of the PAHs among the four functional districts followed the order: education district > traffic area > business district > residential area. However, the individual PAH concentrations exhibited weak correlations with the total organic carbon. Based on the isomer ratios of the PAHs, biomass and coal combustion, and petroleum input were two key factors controlling PAH levels in this study. At a 95% confidence interval, the total incremental lifetime cancer risks for children, adolescents and adults approximated 10(-6)-1.5 x 10(-5).These values were higher than the baseline value for acceptable risk (10(-6)), indicating a potential carcinogenic risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available