3.8 Article

A clinical care pathway to improve the acute care of patients with glioma

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 145-153

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npv050

Keywords

glioma; outcomes; quality improvement

Funding

  1. Norris Cotton Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Patients with glioma are at increased risk for tumor-related and treatment-related complications. Few guidelines exist to manage complications through supportive care. Our prior work suggests that a clinical care pathway can improve the care of patients with glioma. Methods. We designed a quality improvement (QI) project to address the acute care needs of patients with gliomas. We formed a multidisciplinary team and selected 20 best-practice measures from the literature. Using a plan-do-study-act framework, we brain-stormed and implemented various improvement strategies starting in October 2013. Statistical process control charts were used to assess progress. Results. Retrospective data were available for 12 best practice measures. The baseline population consisted of 98 patients with glioma. Record review suggested wide variation in performance, with compliance ranging from 30% to 100%. The team hypothesized that lack of process standardization may contribute to less-than-ideal performance. After implementing improvement strategies, we reviewed the records of 63 consecutive patients with glioma. The proportion of patients meeting criteria for 12 practice measures modestly improved (65% pre-QI; 76% post-QI, P >. 1). Unexpectedly, a higher proportion of patients were readmitted within 30 days of hospital discharge (pre-QI: 10%; post-QI: 17%, P >. 1). Barriers to pathway development included difficulties with transforming manual measures into electronic data sets. Conclusions. Creating evidence-based clinical care pathways for addressing the acute care needs of patients with glioma is feasible and important. There are many challenges, however, to developing sustainable systems for measuring and reporting performance outcomes overtime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available