4.5 Article

Effects of endophytic fungi on the ash dieback pathogen

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw142

Keywords

ash dieback; endophytic fungi; biocontrol; secondary metabolites; antibiotics

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_146591]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_146591] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While Hymenoscyphus fraxineus causes dieback of the European ash (Fraxinus excelsior), flowering ash (F. ornus) appears resistant to the pathogen. To date, contributions of endophytic fungi to host resistance are unknown. The following hypotheses were tested: (i) endophytic fungi enhance the resistance of F. excelsior to the pathogen; (ii) resistance of F. ornus relies on its community of endophytic fungi. Two experiments were performed. (i) The effect of exudates of ash endophytes on the germination rate of H. fraxineus ascospores was studied in vitro. Isolates of abundant Fraxinus leaf endophytes, such as Venturia fraxini, Paraconiothyrium sp., Boeremia exigua, Kretzschmaria deusta and Neofabraea alba inhibited ascospore germination. (ii) Ash seedlings inoculated in a climate chamber, with fungi sporulating on the previous year's leaf litter, were exposed to natural infections by the pathogen present in the forest. Non-inoculated seedlings were used as controls. Venturia spp. dominated the inoculated endophyte 'communities'. Subsequent exposure to H. fraxineus led to infection of F. excelsior leaves by the pathogen, but no differences in health status between pre-inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings were detected. Fraxinus ornus leaves experienced a low infection rate, independent of their colonization by endophytic fungi. These results did not support either hypothesis.Control of ash dieback by endophytic fungi.Control of ash dieback by endophytic fungi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available