4.7 Article

City size distribution across the OECD: Does the definition of cities matter?

Journal

COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 86-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.05.007

Keywords

City size distribution; Zipfs law; Rank-size rule; Metropolitan areas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides new comparative evidence on city size distribution in OECD (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, by using consistently defined functional urban areas (FUAs). FUAs are identified by an algorithm based on population density at grid level and commuting patterns and are thought to better approximate economic agglomerations and their internal spatial organisation. Results show that Zipfs law provides a better description of city size distribution when cities are measured in terms of FUAs rather than using traditional administrative definitions. In addition, Zipfs law describes well city size distribution both at country level and wider spatial scales, that is, by continent and for the whole OECD. Finally, the power law hypothesis - of which Zipfslaw is a particular case- was not rejected in most of the countries. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available